Legal Opinion
Barretta v. Webb Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 13, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and cross motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs cross motion to resettle its prior order. The purpose of resettlement is to revise an order to reflect the court’s decision (Gormel v Prudential Ins. Co., 167 AD2d 829; see also, Rowlee v Dietrich, 88 AD2d 751, 752; Siegel, NY Prac § 250 [2d ed]). Resettlement is not to be used to effect a substantive change in or to amplify the prior decision of the court (Gormel v Prudential Ins. Co., supra; Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 566). The court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Rowlee v. DietrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Gaylord Bros. v. RND Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Gormel v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller v. LanziseraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Simon v. MehryariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Too Pyo Hong v. Byung Wha YooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Martin v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.