Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1910PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Crook: William L. Bradshaw, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

1. The defendant, C. Sam Smith, was convicted of the crime of arson, and appeals from the judgment which followed. His counsel contend, inter alia, that errors were committed in receiving, over objection and exception, testimony tending to prove distinct and independent collateral offenses. The State undertook to establish the defendant’s connection with the crime charged by the testimony of Larkin Elliott, a self-confessed accomplice, to the effect that at the time alleged he and Smith were engaged in raising cattle in Crook County, the profit of which…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Olive v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  2. State v. O'DonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Cowan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  4. State v. RuckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  5. Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Vette v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. State v. WillsonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State v. AusplundOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State v. McClardOregon Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API