Lemieux v. Young, Trustee
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. The facts are stated in the opinion. The provisions of the amended statute, requiring the spreading upon the town records of a notice of intention to sell, seven days before the sale, were in violation of the Constitution of the United States, as abridging and depriving the plaintiff in error of his-liberty, or property or his contract rights, as provided by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. The facts are stated in the opinion. The provisions of the amended statute, requiring the spreading upon the town records of a notice of intention to sell, seven days before the sale, were in violation of the Constitution of the United States, as abridging and depriving the plaintiff in error of his-liberty, or property or his contract rights, as provided by the Fourteenth Amendment. Case below, 79 Connecticut 434, see dissenting opinion of Hammersley, J.; In re Jacobs, 98 N. Y. 98; People v. Marx, 99 N. Y. 377; People v.…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
Whether the following provisions of the general laws of Connecticut are repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment because wanting in due process of law and denying the equal protection of the laws, is the question for decision:. “Sec. 4868., as amended by chapter 72.of the public acts of Connecticut of 1903. No person who makes it his business to buy commodities and sell the same'in small quantities for the purpose of making a profit, shall at a single transaction, and not in the regular course of business sell, assign, or deliver the whole, or a large part of his stock in trade, unless he shall,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Booth v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Wright v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Sol Block & Griff v. SchwartzUtah Supreme Court · 1904
- Hart v. RoneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
3Cited by63 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Central Lumber Co. v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.