Sol Block & Griff v. Schwartz
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County. — Hon. C. W. Morse, Judge. ' Action to recover the price of goods sold. The opinion states the facts. From a justice’s judgment in favor of intervener, reversed on appeal to the District Court, the intervener appealed. So that chapter 67, Sess. Laws, 1901, is violative of the following recognized inherent right: (1) Deprives man of his liberty. (2) Deprives one of the right to acquire and possess property.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County. — Hon. C. W. Morse, Judge. ' Action to recover the price of goods sold. The opinion states the facts. From a justice’s judgment in favor of intervener, reversed on appeal to the District Court, the intervener appealed. So that chapter 67, Sess. Laws, 1901, is violative of the following recognized inherent right: (1) Deprives man of his liberty. (2) Deprives one of the right to acquire and possess property. (3) Deprives one of the right to dispose of his property. (4) Takes from one his property without due process of law. (5) Subjects…
1Opinion of the CourtBartch, J.
This action was originally brought in a. justice’s court on April 2, 1902, to recover $277.47 for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant *391Schwartz. On the same day, at the instance o'f the plaintiffs, the goods were attached while in the possession of the intervener, John Mann, to whom Schwartz had previously, on March 29, 1902, sold and delivered the same for the sum of $550, which was its fair value, the purchase having been made in good faith. After the writ of attachment was levied upon the goods the purchaser filed his complaint in intervention, claiming to own all the property…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Lemieux v. Young, TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Renn v. Utah State Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Jaques & Tinsley Co. v. Carstarphen Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Charges J. Off & Co. v. MoreheadIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Klein v. . MaravelasNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.