Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Maxey

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from, Ninth Judicial District, Gallatin County. Creditor’s Bill. Judgment was rendered for defendants below by Armstrong, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarwood, J.

Through this action, in the nature of creditor’s bill, plaintiffs seek to establish and enforce judgment liens claimed by them upon certain property held and claimed to be owned by defendants.' These conflicting claims arose in this wise: Plaintiffs are the owners of certain judgments rendered against Jacob F. Speith, as the surviving partner of the firm of Speith & Krug, aggregating in amount about twenty thousand dollars, which judgments were rendered in 1888, and are unsatisfied. Defendants are also judgment creditors of the same character; that is, they own judgments recovered against…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gunn v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Hammond v. Hudson River Iron & Machine Co.New York Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Burt v. HœttingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Sperling v. CalfeeMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Krueger v. SpeithMontana Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Cann v. George B. Williams Land & Livestock Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Ryan v. MaxeyMontana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Department of Revenue v. Milwaukee MacK Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API