Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Portillo v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1992No. D017017PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

Benigno A. Portillo pleaded guilty to possessing methamphetamine (meth) for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378) and admitted a presumptive prison allegation (Pen. Code, 1 § 1203.073, subd. (b)(2)) [possessing over 28.5 grams of meth]) and a three-year enhancement (Health & Saf. Code, § 11370.4, subd. (b)(1) [the meth exceeded three pounds]).

On April 16, 1991, the trial court denied probation and sentenced Portillo to prison for five years, consisting of the two-year middle term for the substantive drug offense and a consecutive three years for the enhancement.

Portillo filed a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. TurrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. People v. Fuimaono, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. People v. ScarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. MeloneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. PritchettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API