Legal Opinion

Fink v. Woods

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1907No. Nos. 15,319—(72)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to determine adverse claims to certain vacant and unoccupied land. The case was ' tried before F. V. Brown, J., who ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. From an order, John Day Smith, J., vacating and setting aside the judgment and permitting Clarence H. Woods and Grace Eaton Woods to appear and defend the action, in place of the unknown heirs •of H. C. Woods, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Action brought in the district court of the county of Hennepin against H. C. Woods, his unknown heirs, and all other unknown persons or parties claiming any title in or lien upon the real estate described in the complaint. The summons was served only by publication, and a default judgment for the relief demanded in the complaint was entered on March 8, 1906. On February 8, 1907, the respondents herein, Clarence H. Woods and Grace Eaton Woods, gave notice of a motion, returnable on the sixteenth of the same month, to set aside the judgment and that they be substituted as defendants for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McMurran v. BourneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Fifield v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Cutler v. ButtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doherty v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. De Laittre v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Bellman v. BeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Pedersen v. NewtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Clifford v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API