Legal Opinion

Life of the Land v. Ariyoshi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1976No. 6086PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action Appellants sought an injunction against the construction, planning or appropriation of State funds for the West Oahu College. Appellants have appealed from a judgment denying the injunction. The matter is before us on Appellants ’ motion for a remand of the case to the circuit court to permit Appellants to move under Rule 60(b), H.R.C.P., for relief from the final judgment on the basis of newly discovered evidence.

In Kealoha v. Tanaka, 42 Haw. 630 (1953), this court announced that the proper procedure where a party seeks relief from a final judgment under Rule 60(b) in a case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. PollinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. Austin Joseph Ryan v. United States Lines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Roy Ferrell v. Trailmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Kealoha ex rel. Arruda v. TanakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. TyrrellHawaii Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Keahole Defense Coalition, Inc. v. Board of Land & Natural ResourcesHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hayashi v. HayashiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Schnidt v. HSC, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Huneycutt v. HuneycuttNevada Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API