Legal Opinion

State v. Tyrrell

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1976No. 5987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this appeal from a conviction of murder, Appellant has moved to remand the case to the circuit court to permit Appellant to move for a new trial under Rule 33 H.R.Cr.P. upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence, being the recantation of a prosecution witness.

Rule 33, H.R.Cr.P. provides:

The court may grant a new trial to a defendant if required in the interest of justice. If trial was by the court without a jury the court may vacate the judgment if entered, take additional testimony and direct the entry of a new judgment. A motion for a new trial based on the ground of newly discovered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States of America, and v. James Gilbert HaysCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. The People of the Territory of Guam v. Bobby G. InglettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Life of the Land v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API