Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth Ex Rel. Hollingsworth v. Burns

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1936Published

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

It is conceded that there was ample evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant’s driver warranting the verdict on that issue.

Eut the appellant’s principal assignment of error is to the failure of the judge below to hold, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff on his own testimony was guilty of contributory negligence, barring recovery, and that therefore the motion for judgment of nonsuit should have been allowed.

This renders it necessary to examine the plaintiff’s testimony. Pertinent to the question involved, the plaintiff testified substantially as follows:

“I got hurt about 4:30…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rolin v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Tart Ex Rel. Tart v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Fry v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Hoggard v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Ghorley v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API