Baltimore Building Ass'n No. 2 v. Grant
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. This suit was instituted by the appellees to recover from the appellant the value of certain real estate sold tinder proceedings to foreclose a mortgage. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court. The plaintiffs offered three prayers; the first and second were refused; the third was granted. The defendant offered two prayers which the Court (Gabby,' J.,) refused.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. This suit was instituted by the appellees to recover from the appellant the value of certain real estate sold tinder proceedings to foreclose a mortgage. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court. The plaintiffs offered three prayers; the first and second were refused; the third was granted. The defendant offered two prayers which the Court (Gabby,' J.,) refused. The verdict and judgment being for the plaintiffs, the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBartor, C. J.
In this caso the judgment was rendered on the verdict of the jury, upon the 10th day of February, 1874. The bill *564of exceptions appears to have been signed and sealed on the first day of May, 1874. It has been contended on the part of the appellee, that it was then too late, and that therefore there is no sufficient bill of exceptions before us, and in support of this position we have been referred to Walton vs. U. States, 9 Wheaton, 651; Ex parte Bradstreet, 4 Peters, 102 ; and Phelps vs. Mayer, 15 Howard, 160. In Walton vs. U. States, the bill of exceptions stated that the evidence was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Owings v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
- Stockton v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1846
- Ex Parte Martha Bradstreet in the Matter of James Jackson Ex Dem. Martha Bradstreet v. Daniel ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Leopard v. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1843
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. LeasureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Edelhoff & Rinke v. Horner-Miller Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Fletcher v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Kaefer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
- Rosenkovitz v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.