Legal Opinion

People v. Surplice

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1962No. Crim. 7890; Crim. 7891PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.

In an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County defendants Baymond George Surplice and Elizabeth Surplice were charged together with codefendant Joseph Lawrence Albany with having marijuana in their possession on January 16, 1961, in violation of section 11530 of the Health and Safety Code. Defendant Elizabeth Surplice was charged with a previous conviction of possessing a counterfeit obligation and conspiracy. Defendant Bonald Steven Peterson was charged with having marijuana in his possession on January 17, 1961, in violation of section 11530 of the Health and Safety…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. People v. CrandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. RistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API