Stulginski v. Cizauskas
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The complaint is for the foreclosure of a judgment lien upon the defendant’s land in Waterbury, filed to secure a judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for $3248.54 and costs, rendered April 21, 1938. The defendant’s answer admits the allegations of the complaint except that the judgment had never been paid in whole or part, and alleges that: the judgment was rendered in an action for the defendant’s tort which inflicted physical injury during an altercation with the plaintiff, a fellow employee of the Waterbury Rolling Mills Company; this injury was sustained by the plaintiff in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Dwy v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Warax v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
- Dickerson v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Graham v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- United States v. AcordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.