Legal Opinion

Wesley v. Georgetown University

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 2, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2018-1539Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CLARENCE WESLEY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 18-1539 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Clarence Wesley, an African-American male, claims that his employer, Georgetown University, a private university located in Washington, D.C., subjected him “to a hostile work environment because of his race and because of his engagement in protected activity,” and retaliated against him for engaging in protected activity, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API