Legal Opinion

Rice v. Rice

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1988No. S-2249, S-2275PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This appeal is from a divorce decree. Jim D. Rice and Diana Lee Rice were married in 1976. Prior to and throughout the marriage, Jim was employed by the City of Fairbanks Fire Department. One of his employment benefits includes enrollment in the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS).

The trial court treated the retirement fund as a marital asset, divided it in half as of the date of divorce and entered a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) to pay one-half of the retirement benefits to Diana when Jim either resigns, is terminated or becomes deceased. Jim…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Julsen v. JulsenAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hammond v. HoffbeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hartland v. HartlandAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Zito v. ZitoAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Municipality of Anchorage v. GallionAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Edelman v. EdelmanAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Keffer v. KefferAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API