Legal Opinion

Florists' Mutual Insurance v. Tatterson

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided October 6, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-29-NNPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

DOUMAR, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(4), on appeal from a jury trial before a United States Magistrate Judge. The appellee, William B. Tatterson, a greenhouse operator, obtained a judgment for $165,000.00 in this action on an insurance contract which insured his crops and buildings from “direct loss” due to “weight of snow,” claiming damages to his crops flowing from a snowstorm. The appellant, Florists’ Mutual Insurance Company, denied coverage for alleged crop damage contending that it was not direct. Tatterson also…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. A & E Supply Company, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, a & E Supply Company, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  2. Banks v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  3. Commercial Distributors, Inc. v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  4. Meeks v. HodgesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  5. Winfree v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. v. United Guaranty Residential InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
  2. Baybrook v. ChaterDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1996
  3. Coker v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 1998
  4. United States v. SteinertDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  5. United States v. DemottDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API