Legal Opinion

United States v. Demott

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided July 10, 2001No. CR. 00-404-APublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CACHERIS, District Judge.

At issue is the constitutionality of two regulations governing conduct at the Pentagon. Defendant/Appellant Peter J. De-Mott (“DeMott”) brings this appeal from the decision of the Magistrate Judge finding him guilty of failing to obey a police officer’s lawful order to move from one location to another while engaged in peaceful protest on the grounds of the Pentagon. For the reasons set forth below, the Court affirms the opinion of the Magistrate Judge and upholds the challenged regulations.

I

The following discussion of the facts is drawn from the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API