Legal Opinion

Flanders v. Tweed

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 31, 1873PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana, in which court Tweed sued Flanders, deputy general agent of the Treasury Department of the United States, to recover damages caused by an alleged unlawful seizure and detention of certain cotton of his, Tweed’s. Judgment being given for the plaintiff the treasury agent appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clifford

stated the case, and delivered the opinion of the court.

Tweed claims that he was the owner of four hundred and ninety-five bales of cotton; that the defendant, on the sixth of March, 1866, unlawfully seized and took the same into his possession, and that he unlawfully detained the cotton until the fifteenth of May in the same year, when he, the plaintiff, obtained possession of the cotton by virtue of two writs of sequestration which he instituted in the same court for that purpose, and that he expressly reserved the right to recover damages for the seizure and detention of the cotton in his…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Summit Valley Industries, Inc. v. Local 112, United Brotherhood of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Straus v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  4. Hardisty v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Burruss v. HinesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API