Legal Opinion

Niagara Fire Insurance v. Powell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 11, 1966No. 41804PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. A one-year contractual limitation upon the filing of such an action as is here involved has been held valid by the Supreme Court and this court. Springfield Fire &c. Ins. Co. v. Carter, 110 Ga. App. 382 (1, 3) (138 SE2d 590); Aiken v. Northwestern Mutual Ins. Co., 106 Ga. App. 220 (126 SE2d 630) and cit.

2. Where an action is brought on a policy containing a one-year contractual limitation upon the filing of an action on the policy the petition must allege either a waiver of the provision or an estoppel against the insurer to rely on the provision of the policy limiting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Underwriters' Agency v. SutherlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  2. Stanley v. Sterling Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. Lee Chocolate CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. Gibraltar Fire & Marine Insurance v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Aiken v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darnell v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Gravely v. Southern Trust InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Gravely v. Southern Trust InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API