Legal Opinion

Novak v. Cox

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1988No. 86-1130PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REILLY, Senior Judge:

In an appeal from a judgment entered in the landlord-tenant branch of the Superior Court, the landlord in his brief has raised more than twenty objections to the written findings and conclusions of law contained in the memorandum opinion of the trial court accompanying its order. In our view, most of these assignments of error have no merit, but as certain findings appear lacking in evidentiary support, and these in turn led to erroneous conclusions affecting the final accounting, we remand the case for further findings and the entry of a revised judgment. A brief summary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. HowardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Crowder v. LackeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. Eleven Fourteen, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Cowan v. YoussefDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Double H Housing Corp. v. DavidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Auger v. Tasea Investment Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Auger v. Tasea Investment Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API