Legal Opinion

Nicholas v. Howard

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1983No. 82-718PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from an order of the trial court, in the Landlord and Tenant Branch, denying appellants’ motion for a money judgment following a successful suit for possession. Finding no error, we affirm the trial court’s order.

In late September 1981, appellants purchased a Capitol Hill townhouse. In October 1981, they learned that appellees, tenants of the former owner, still occupied the premises. After efforts to negotiate a lease with appellees proved unsuccessful, appellants brought suit for possession; however, that suit was dismissed for failure to serve a notice to quit. Subsequently,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. McNeal v. HabibDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Dameron v. Capitol House Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Thornhill v. Atlantic Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  5. Young & Simon, Inc. v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Administrator of Veterans Affairs v. ValentineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Young v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Walker v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Duk Hea Oh v. National Capital Revitalization Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Ricardo Hernandez v. Bryant BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API