Legal Opinion · Dissent

Auger v. Tasea Investment Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1996No. 94-CV-1654Published

1DissentFerren, Associate Judge

Contrary to the majority’s focus on the parties’ relationship as business partners,1 resolution of this case depends solely on the proper interpretation of a month-to-month lease agreement for real property, unaffected by other aspects of the parties’ business relationship.

I

During the one-day bench trial on October 24, 1995, the parties presented evidence of their written agreement, which provided:

AUGER or his designee shall have the right to lease from the Partnership at a reasonable rate ... (ii) the Woodson/Cal-low lots for parking of vehicles until such time as the Partnership shall need…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mendes v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Bingham v. Goldberg. Marchesano. Kohlman. Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Bown v. HamiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Habib v. ThurstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. William J. Davis, Inc. v. SladeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API