Auger v. Tasea Investment Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1DissentFerren, Associate Judge
Contrary to the majority’s focus on the parties’ relationship as business partners,1 resolution of this case depends solely on the proper interpretation of a month-to-month lease agreement for real property, unaffected by other aspects of the parties’ business relationship.
I
During the one-day bench trial on October 24, 1995, the parties presented evidence of their written agreement, which provided:
AUGER or his designee shall have the right to lease from the Partnership at a reasonable rate ... (ii) the Woodson/Cal-low lots for parking of vehicles until such time as the Partnership shall need…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mendes v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Bingham v. Goldberg. Marchesano. Kohlman. Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Bown v. HamiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Habib v. ThurstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- William J. Davis, Inc. v. SladeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.