Legal Opinion
Walker v. Briley
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided April 18, 2001No. CV 00-BU-2145-EPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
BUTTRAM, District Judge.
In the above-styled action, John Walker claims that Kevin Briley, a municipal police officer, and his employer, the City of Anniston, Alabama (the “City”) (collectively “Defendants”), are liable pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of Walker’s constitutional rights and pursuant to Alabama law for false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. Walker also claims that the City is liable under Alabama law for allegedly failing to properly train and supervise Briley. Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ex Parte City of TuskegeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Gagliardi v. FisherDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Exford v. City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
- McCray v. City of DothanDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- Rogers v. City of SelmaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.