Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. South Carolina Public Service Commission

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided February 26, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit, instituted by the Southern Railway Company against the members of the South Carolina Public Service Commission and the Governor and the Attorney General of that state, to enjoin them from attempting to enforce against the Railway Company penalties for discontinuing the operation of two certain passenger trains between Branchville, S. C., and the South Carolina-Georgia state line. An interlocutory injunction was asked and a court of three judges was constituted pursuant to section 266 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 380. The hearing on the application…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Colorado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1948
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API