Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1950PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Vandeebilt, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Superior Court affirming an order of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners directing the appellant railroad to continue to operate its trains Nos. 828 and 829 on its Peiins Grove Branch daily except Satur days and Sundays.

*117The Penns Grove Branch, 20.3 miles in length, running from Woodbury to Penns Grove, is virtually paralleled by a Public Service bus route. On July 22, 1949, the railroad gave notice to the respondent Board of Public Utility Commissioners that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Colorado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sheerr v. Evesham Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  2. Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Terracciona v. MageeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. Susquehanna Transit Commuters Ass'n v. BD. OF PUB. UTIL. COMM'RSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API