Legal Opinion

Northland Insurance v. Avis Rent-A-Car

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1974No. 303PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

Avis and Liberty argue the trial court erred in applying sec. 347.29 (5), Stats., which requires two red flags to be used when a truck is left standing in a lane of traffic. Avis and Liberty claim the accident occurred within the city of Oak Creek and therefore the section was not applicable. They also claim the court erred in not finding Balistreri negligent under sec. 346.14 (1), which prohibits tailgating; and finally that the court was in error in applying the emergency doctrine when there was no issue of management and control involved.

The facts are not substantially in dispute. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Herchelroth v. MaharWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Geis v. HirthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Royal Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Cook v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Bourestom v. BourestomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Cavanaugh v. AndradeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wrinn v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Totsky v. Riteway Bus Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  4. Estate of Cavanaugh v. AndradeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API