Legal Opinion

Papacostopulos v. Morrelli

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided February 7, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Margaret Gammer, J.

This is an ex parte application by petitioner to amend the address of the premises contained in the 30-day notice, notice of petition and petition herein from an incorrect to the correct address. Petitioner’s attorney, contending that this change is “immaterial” since respondents had appeared in this action and entered into a stipulation of settlement, makes this request because the defective description has apparently prevented petitioner from obtaining a warrant of eviction.

For the following reasons, the application is denied and the court, sua sponte,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. In Re the Probate of the Will of WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. In Matter of City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Potter v. New York Baptist Mission SocietyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
  5. Kleinstein v. GonskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gazes v. Roswick (In Re Roswick)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  2. Fosmire v. NicoleauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Capital Resources Corp. v. DoeCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992
  4. Katz Park Avenue Corp. v. OldenCivil Court of the City of New York · 1993
  5. Nauth v. NauthCivil Court of the City of New York · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API