Legal Opinion

Kleinstein v. Gonsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 12, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Hyman Kleinstein, from a final order of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York in favor of the defendants, entered on the 31st day of March, 1909.

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

The respondents are in possession of premises belonging to the appellant, as his tenants under a lease which contains a covenant that “ all repairs of every kind, nature and description in and upon said premises * * * shall be done and complied with ” by the said tenants, and a further covenant that “ if default shall be made in any of the covenants herein contained, or in the prompt payment of the water bills that may become due upon said premises, then it shall be lawful for the said party of the first part [the landlord] to re-enter the said premises, the same to have again and to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beach v. . NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Silkman v. Board of Water CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Anzolone v. PaskuszAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Baylies v. IngramAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Oakley v. SchoonmakerNew York Supreme Court · 1836

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Norman S. Riesenfeld, Inc. v. R-W Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  2. Gilroy v. BeckerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945
  3. Lawyers Title & Guaranty Co. v. TausigCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
  4. Papacostopulos v. MorrelliCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
  5. Arroyo v. RosenbluthCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API