State Ex Rel. Ross v. Krichbaum, 07 Ma 151 (12-21-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
{¶ 1} On August 28, 2007, Relator, Lawrence Ross commenced this procedendo action against Respondent, Judge R. Scott Krichbaum, to compel the judge to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law from its denial of Relator's November 13 and 18, 1996 motion for speedy trial. On September 6, 2007, Respondent filed a combined answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons expressed below, Respondent's motion for judgment on the pleadings is hereby granted and Relator's writ is denied.
{¶ 2} In order to be entitled to a writ of procedendo, Relator must…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Weiss v. HooverOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Ft. Frye Teachers Assn., OEA/NEA v. State Emp. Relations Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Board of State Teachers Retirement System v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Bryan v. KnappOhio Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 2012