Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Weiss v. Hoover

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1999No. 98-2450PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5), we must determine whether dismissal, an alternative writ, or a peremptory writ is appropriate. Under the applicable standard, if it appears beyond doubt that relator is entitled to the requested extraordinary relief, a peremptory writ should issue. State ex rel. Dist. 1199, Health Care & Soc. Serv. Union, SEIU, AFL-CIO v. Lawrence Cty. Gen. Hosp. (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 351, 353, 699 N.E.2d 1281, 1282.

Weiss claims that he is entitled to a writ of procedendo. In order to be entitled to a writ of procedendo, Weiss must establish a clear legal right to require *532respond…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sherrills v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Miley v. ParrottOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Red Head Brass, Inc. v. Holmes County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. GMS Management Co. v. CallahanOhio Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Culgan v. CollierOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State ex rel. Charvat v. FryeOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State ex rel. R.W. Sidley, Inc. v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Board of State Teachers Retirement System v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2007

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API