Legal Opinion

Marks v. Newmark

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1890No. Civil No. 302PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. William W. Porter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

This is an action to enjoin the sale of certain real estate situated in the city of Phoenix, under an execution issued upon a judgment recovered by appellants herein against Simon Marks, the husband of appellee. The property in question was conveyed by Guss Ellis & Co., in 1886, to the appellee, Sarah Marks, for a money consideration expressed in the deed. At the time of the conveyance appellee’s husband, Simon Marks, the defendant in the execution proceeding, was engaged in the mercantile business in said city of Phoenix. Subsequently he failed, and on the-twenty-fourth day of May, 1887,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christy v. ArnoldArizona Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Demille v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Ward v. ShermanArizona Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Miller v. DouglasArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Hardiker v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API