Legal Opinion

Ward v. Sherman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1901No. Civil No. 746PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. Webster Street, Judge.

1Per curiam

The brief of the appellant in this ease contains the following assignment of errors: “ (1) The court erred in admitting evidence adduced by the defendant. (2) The court erred in rejecting evidence offered by the plaintiff. (3) The evidence does not sustain the judgment, findings, or verdict of the court. (4) The evidence does not sustain the findings of the court. (5) The judgment of the court is contrary to the law. (6) The judgment of the court is contrary to the evidence.” The rules of this court (rule 3, 4 Ariz. ix, 35 Pac. vi) require “a specification of the errors relied upon,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Main v. MainArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Ede v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Christy v. ArnoldArizona Supreme Court · 1894
  4. United States ex rel. Coquard v. Indian Grave Drainage Dist.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
  5. Marks v. NewmarkArizona Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. County of Pinal v. HeinerArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Liberty Mining & Smelting Co. v. GeddesArizona Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Prescott National Bank v. HeadArizona Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Hardiker v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Scarry v. EplerArizona Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API