Legal Opinion

Blanchard v. Gallahar

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 1, 1945No. 30684PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

It is well-settled law that if Dunn and the plaintiff’s husband were fellow servants, their master (Blanchard) would not be liable for the death of her husband, if it were caused by the negligence of Dunn. ‘“Except in case of railroad companies, the master shall not be liable to one servant for injuries arising from the negligence or misconduct of other servants about the same business.” Code, § 66-304. In this case the petition clearly shows that the death of Gallahar was the result of Dunn’s negligence. Therefore, the only question here presented is whether the petition, properly construed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Dublin Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Hamby v. Union Paper-Mills Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Salter v. NugentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cosar v. BemoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Miller v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Miller v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Cosar v. BemoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API