Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Rimmer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1964No. 743PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The reciprocal duties of motorists approaching an intersection from dominant and servient highways have been often stated. Matheny v. Motor Lines, 233 N.C. 673, 65 S.E. 2d 361; Blalock v. Hart, 239 N.C. 475, 80 S.E. 2d 373.

This intersection collision occurred in a rural area where the maximum legal rate of speed was fifty-five miles per hour. Defendant told the investigating officer that he was driving only fifty miles per hour. Since neither the plaintiff nor his wife ever saw the defendant’s approaching automobile, plaintiff relies on the one hundred and twenty-six feet of skid marks south…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matheny v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Blalock v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Blalock v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Williamson v. RandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barney v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Hughes Ex Rel. Hughes v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Howard v. MelvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Hall v. KimberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Whitley v. HardingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API