Clayton v. Rimmer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The reciprocal duties of motorists approaching an intersection from dominant and servient highways have been often stated. Matheny v. Motor Lines, 233 N.C. 673, 65 S.E. 2d 361; Blalock v. Hart, 239 N.C. 475, 80 S.E. 2d 373.
This intersection collision occurred in a rural area where the maximum legal rate of speed was fifty-five miles per hour. Defendant told the investigating officer that he was driving only fifty miles per hour. Since neither the plaintiff nor his wife ever saw the defendant’s approaching automobile, plaintiff relies on the one hundred and twenty-six feet of skid marks south…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matheny v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Blalock v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Blalock v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Williamson v. RandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barney v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Hughes Ex Rel. Hughes v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Howard v. MelvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Hall v. KimberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Whitley v. HardingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.