Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Fixture Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 9, 2002No. 01-9516PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1144PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Petitioner National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) seeks enforcement of its order issued in Oklahoma Fixture Co., 331 N.L.R.B. No. 145 (2000). In that order, the NLRB found that Respondent Oklahoma Fixture Company (“OFC”) violated Sections 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1), (5) (the “Act”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 160(e) and we deny enforcement.
The facts in this case are not in dispute. OFC is engaged in the manufacture and installation of retail store fixtures. The United Brotherhood of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Communications Workers of America v. BeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Fixture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Sanders v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Fixture Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Fixture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Fixture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003