National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Fixture Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Dissent
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge,
dissenting.
No one, not the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”), not the parties and not even the court, posits that the “permit fees” in this case are membership dues. Counsel for the Board candidly admitted at oral argument that this was a first, particularly when the source of the authority for these fees is not contained in the record.1 The court concludes that “membership dues” is ambiguous because “agency fees” have been included within the *1293term, as well as initiation fees and other union assessments. Finding ambiguity, the court defers to the NLRB…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ewing v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.