Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

May v. Baklini

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1973No. 994Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSutin, Judge

I. Appellate Courf s Review of Briefs in Arriving at Decision

In Durrett v. Petritsis, 82 N.M. 1, 3, 474 P.2d 487, 489 (1970), the Supreme Court stated:

We have often said that the presumptions are in favor of verdicts and the facts are to be viewed in the aspect most favorable to the prevailing party.

Appellants in damage suits, angry and frustrated by loss, blindly appeal in search of reversal. Many attorneys who try and appeal cases are incompetent or lack the time to read the law or follow the rules of procedure. Competent attorneys successfully appeal. Clients have a duty to seek counsel…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Stambaugh v. HayesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Jewell v. SeidenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Frei v. BrownleeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Morris v. CartwrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. City of Albuquerque v. AckermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API