Hutchings v. Caledonian Ins. Co. of Scotland
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRONER, District Judge.
This is an action begun by Hutchings and Pratt, copartners, against Caledonian Insurance Company for the recovery of $8,000 on a policy of insurance commonly known as “use and occupancy insurance,” under the terms of which defendant, as insurer, agreed if the tobacco warehouse, described in the policy, should be destroyed or damaged by fire so as to necessitate a total or partial suspension of business, the insurer would be liable for the loss of profits at the rate of $200 a day for a definite period.
' In July, 1927, Hutchings, individually, had leased a tobacco…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Eames v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Northern Assurance Co. of London v. Grand View Building Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Relief Fire Ins. Co. of NY v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of CanadaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
- Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corp. of Baltimore v. BilquistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Home Ins. v. Campbell Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Ruston Drilling Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Smith Engineering Co. v. PrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.