Legal Opinion

Harris v. City of Seattle

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 26, 2004No. C02-2225PPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT KING BROADCASTING’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL

PECHMAN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant KING Broadcasting Company’s (“KING”) Motion for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. No. 87), and Plaintiffs Motion to Compel the Continuance of Duane Pohl-man’s Deposition and Production of Documents, (Dkt. No. 105). Having considered all of the pleadings and supporting documents, the Court GRANTS KING’S Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff has failed to show that KING or KING’S investigative reporter Duane Pohlman…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. World Publishing Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
  2. Anaya v. CBS BROADCASTING INC.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2009
  3. Paterson v. Little, Brown & Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2007
  4. Phillips v. KIRO-TV, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
  5. Phillips v. Seattle Times Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API