Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Parker

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 21, 1988No. ACM 26760PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

LEWIS, Senior Judge:

Today we reverse findings of guilty and the sentence in a case in which the prosecution evidence consisted of a positive test result of a urine sample obtained in the course of what was intended to be a unit inspection in accordance with MiLR.Evid. 313(b). The appellant entered a conditional plea of guilty to wrongful use of cocaine. The conditional plea preserves for appellate review his motion to suppress the urinalysis evidence. R.C.M. 910(a)(2).

The appellant asserted at trial that his urine was not properly obtained during a unit inspection within the meaning…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. JohnstonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. ArruzaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. ShepherdU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. AlexanderU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. PompeyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. PappasU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. MooreNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  5. United States v. MurphyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API