Legal Opinion

United States v. Pappas

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided February 16, 1990No. ACM 27834PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

LEONARD, Judge:

Appellant was found guilty by court members of use of cocaine based on a positive urine sample submitted during a unit urinalysis inspection. His basis for appeal is that the unit urinalysis inspection did not meet the requirements of equal protection under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution or Mil.R. Evid. 313(b) and the military judge erred in denying his motion to suppress the positive test results on the urine sample taken from him during that inspection. We disagree and find no merit to appellant’s assertions.

In his first attack, the appellant,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. LangeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  5. United States v. MeansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. AlexanderU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. EvansU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. MooreNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API