Legal Opinion
Al-Hashimi v. Scott
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided January 31, 1991No. CV 190-014PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDENFIELD, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, Hassan M. Al-Hashimi (“Al-Hashimi”), complains that the defendants discriminated against him because of his race, age, and national origin in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1988), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (1988), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, (“ADEA”) 81 Stat. 602 (1967), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34 (1988). He is also suing for breach of contract. 1
The defendant, Dr. Julius S. Scott, Jr. (“Scott”), has moved for summary judgment on the section 1981, Title VII and ADEA claims. 2 He has…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allison v. Gulf Employees Credit UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1993
- Tolbert v. Briggs and Stratton Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007
- Hall v. Central TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
- Uzzell v. MurrayDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2019