Jung v. City of Phoenix
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolohan, Justice
(Retired).
The plaintiffs, appellants, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against the City of Phoenix seeking damages and injunctive relief because of alleged discrimination by the defendant city in charging different water rates for customers residing outside its exterior boundaries. The plaintiffs also sought to maintain the action as a class action upon behalf of all customers of the defendant city similarly affected by the water rates.
The superior court granted the city’s motion to dismiss which also mooted the question of maintaining the action as a class action. On appeal, the Court…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Phoenix v. KasunArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Delony v. RuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- City of Pompano Beach v. OltmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mitchell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- West Capital Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of AnnapolisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Platt v. Town of TorreyUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- Fidelty Security Life Insurance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Robson Ranch Quail Creek, LLC v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.