Legal Opinion
Pankow Construction Co. v. Advance Mortgage Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 13, 1980No. 76-3730PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
This is an action against a mortgage lender (Advance), brought by a general contractor (Pankow) to recover the balance allegedly due under a contract between Pankow and a construction project developer (Pacheco). The district court denied recovery. We affirm.
In the spring of 1972, Pacheco embarked upon a plan to build a residential apartment complex in Novato, California. After obtaining a commitment from HUD to insure the mortgage loan under section 221(d)(4) of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 17151 (d)(4), Pacheco entered into a Building Loan Agreement with…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Miree v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, a Nebraska Corporation, and Ranier Construction Company, Inc., an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Esther Lee Begay, Etc. v. The Kerr-Mcgee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Clark v. MusickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Donald Emery Major v. Arizona State Prison, John Moran, H. J. Cardwell, Capt. HoulihanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Nelson v. BennettDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.