Rettinger Raincoat Mfg. Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
LaNdis, Judge:
This case has been submitted for decision on the following stipulation of counsel:
It Is HeReby Stipulated AND AgReed by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, that the merchandise involved in the above entitled protest consists of black rainwear of synthetic rubber assessed with duty under Paragraph 216, Tariff Act of 1930 as modified by the General Agreement 'on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 51802, at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem as articles composed wholly or in part of carbon or graphite, wholly or partly manufactured…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Weather-Rite Sportswear Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Miller Harness Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- J. M. Rodgers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968