Legal Opinion

Ansell v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 12, 1923No. Appeal, No. 176PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff’s son, when within one month of fourteen years of age, was drowned by falling into a pond of water, formed by the filling, from springs and other sources, of an abandoned quarry, on land of the city taken for park purposes. A used roadway, which ran the length of the body of water, was fenced off by a two-rail fence; but the boy crossed this barrier, and, when playing with his dog, met with the unfortunate accident which caused his death. The court below entered a non-suit, which it subsequently refused to remove, and this appeal followed.

We are not convinced of error; a…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cooper v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. White v. Kanawha City Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Brown v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Dornick Et Ux. v. Wierton C. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Murdock Et Ux. v. Pa. Railroad Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API