Legal Opinion

Miracle v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 10, 1929No. 18719PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, C.

The plaintiff in error, V. W. Miracle, who was plaintiff in the trial court, commenced this action in the district coux-t of Okfuskee county to reform a deed executed by one Berry Jones, conveying certain lands to one C. T. Huddleston, plaintiff’s immediate grantor. At the time the action was commenced, Jones was deceased, and his heirs were the parties against whom the suit was brought.

The facts as established by the only competent evidence introduced, disclosed that plaintiff and C. T. Huddleston were interested in, and succeeded in getting approved by the county court, a conveyance…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Trust Co. v. ChittySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Cleveland v. RankinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Wills v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Barrows v. AlfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Davidson v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pancoast v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Leonard v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. American Life Insurance v. RatcliffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API