Gifford v. Casper Neon Sign Co., Inc.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The issue to be resolved in this case is the nature of the showing of a meritorious defense which must be made under Rule 60(b), W.R.C.P., 1 in order to obtain relief from a judgment based upon a cognovit clause in a contract. The district court held that the appellant failed to make a sufficient showing. Under our previously articulated requirements for review of an order denying relief under Rule 60(b), we consider only whether the district court committed an abuse of discretion. We shall’hold that in the circumstances of this case there was an abuse of discretion, and we…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- SWARB Et Al. v. LENNOX Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Nehring v. RussellWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stauffer Chemical Co. v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Adel v. ParkhurstWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- U.S. Aviation, Inc. v. Wyoming Avionics, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Essex Holding, LLC v. Basic Props., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Herring v. Welltech, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.