Legal Opinion
Essex Holding, LLC v. Basic Props., Inc.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 2018No. S-17-0240PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, Justice.
[¶1] Essex Holding, LLC (Essex) and Basic Properties, Inc. (Basic) each own lots in a shopping center subject to restrictive covenants. Basic requested Essex's consent to amend the covenants to allow Basic to develop one of its lots. Essex refused, litigation ensued, and a jury awarded Basic $200,000 in damages. The district court also awarded attorney fees and costs to Basic. Essex filed post-trial motions which the district court denied, and Essex filed its appeal within 30 days of that denial. Essex challenges the verdict and damages award, along with several *713of the district…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Obriecht v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- In the Interest Of: RR, KR and RR, Minor Children, FR v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- TC & GC v. State (In re L-Mhb)Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Ianelli v. CaminoWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Circle C Resources v. Charlene HasslerWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- MSC v. MCGWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.