Legal Opinion

Stegall v. American Pigment & Chemical Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 23, 1915PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. George G. Hitchcock, Judge. Transferred to St. Louis Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, C.

This is a proceeding by writ •of error to review the action of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis in overruling a motion to quash an •execution.

In June, 1908, Harry W. Stegall (defendant in •error) instituted, before a justice of the peace in the •city of St. Louis, a suit against the American Pigment & Chemical Company, a corporation (plaintiff in error), to recover judgment upon an account in the sum of $230, for services rendered.

*720The defendant company appeared specially in the justice court and moved to quash the return made by a special constable in executing the writ…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Howard v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. In Re ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Brookline Canning & Packing Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Stegall v. American Pigment & Chemical Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. State ex rel. American Pigment & Chemical Co. v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. EganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Robinson v. NickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. Kristanik v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Hohlstein Ex Rel. Hohlstein v. St. Louis Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Bealmer v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API